difference betn legends n mortals
Difference between the Legends and mere Mortals
While watching the final day of the first test between India and West Indies on television, I heard an Australian commentator (couldn’t guess his name from his voice) argue Kumble and Ponting’s case against Warne, Muralitharan and Lara, Tendulkar respectively. He had based his arguments on the fact that Kumble and Ponting have records which are comparable with the greats mentioned above. But what he was forgetting is that sports (as well as art) and society are radically different and statistics cannot be used as Constitutional laws.
“Why isn’t Kumble mentioned in the same breath as Warne and Muralitharan or why isn’t Ponting mentioned in the same breath as Lara and Tendulkar?” was his query. Hearing such comments from watchers of the game is quite normal but what surprised me was the fact that these words came from someone who has played the game himself.
I have had heated debates on this topic with quite a few of my friends and there are a couple of points I would like to make.
Firstly, one needs to accept that some people are just born with talent and charisma and these attributes cannot be acquired by any amount of hard work. How much effect does Dravid or Ponting playing or not playing a game have, on the ticket sales or television viewership? We all know that the answer to this question in case of Lara or Tendulkar is ‘huge’.
Another thing is that players like Dravid or Steve Waugh need an occasion to shine. Let Steve Waugh walk in to bat with Australia comfortably placed at 250/3 on the first day of a test match and he will rarely impress. Agreed he has bailed Australia out of many crises but he needs divine intervention in creation of these crises whereas Lara and Tendulkar can entertain and enthrall the spectators under any given circumstances.
One point which is seldom brought to light is the ability of these greats to make playing easy for their teammates. Yuvraj Singh smashed Glenn McGrath to all parts of the park enroute to a match-winning 84 not out, on debut at Nairobi. Prior to that memorable innings, Sachin had blasted a 25 ball 39 in which he clobbered 3 fours and a six off Glenn’s first 3 overs. The question that arises is, could Yuvraj have played a similar innings but for Sachin’s cameo? The answer is ‘NO’ because I have never seen the Punjabi lad destroy the Australian seamer ever after. There are very few batsmen in world cricket who possess this virtue, Gilchrist, Sehwag and Afridi being the others but none do it as consistently as Sachin or Lara.
Another hallmark of great champions is the ease and enthusiasm with which they play the game. If you observe stalwarts like Sampras, Michael Jordan, Tiger Woods and Ronaldinho, they have a twinkle in their eyes and innocence in their smile which ‘mortals’ can only dream of possessing.
Also it is said in dance and other art forms that the efforts you put in practice shouldn't be seen in your performance. If you are a connoisseur of cricket you will agree that while Dravid and Steve Waugh play cricket on the playground, Sachin and Lara perform the art of batsmanship on the cricketing stage
We all know how the country heaved a collective a sigh of relief when Tendulkar signaled his return to form by hitting that unforgettable workmanlike 241 in Steve Waugh’s farewell test at the SCG. My question to that Australian commentator is, would Rahul Dravid’s or Ricky Ponting’s comeback innings invoke similar responses?
This reminds me of Kumble’s comment after picking up 8 wickets in the first innings of the same Test. When queried by a reporter as to why he hasn’t performed with this consistency overseas, his retort was, “When have I got a chance to bowl with 500+ runs on the board when playing abroad?” This reply justifies Kumble’s place in the class of ‘mortals’. What he was forgetting is that Warne and Murali run through sides irrespective of the playing surface and the score they are defending.
There is no arguing the fact that players like Dravid, Kumble, Ponting and Steve Waugh are of immense value to the team they play for. But as the popular MasterCard advertisements rightly show, there are some things in life which are invaluable and these some things are the distinguishing factors between ‘the legends’ and ‘the mortals’.
I remember a poster at the GABBA which said “I came here to see GOD bat!” Do I need to specify who he was referring to? Only certain blessed ones are lucky to get such adulation from opposing fans.
These sportsmen cross boundaries of teams and nations and come to epitomize the sport itself. The definition of ‘Cricket’ to the non-cricketing world could well be a game played by Lara or Tendulkar just as we associate Cycling with Lance Armstrong and Basketball with Michael Jordan.
Having said all this, I still feel that no extent of vocabulary is sufficient to describe these geniuses. I really pity people who make comparisons like that Australian commentator and try to find faults with these heroes for they don't know what they are missing. As an avid sports lover I feel priviledged to have witnessed these ‘legends’ grace the sporting field.